User talk:Cedelmwood
,_Korkeasaari.JPG)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Merry Christmas!
[edit]Season's greetings and Merry Christmas to you and your family. Have a wonderful holiday season. Cheers! RV (talk) 02:31, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg)
@RAJIVVASUDEV: Thank you! Have a merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you too! 
treekangaroos (talk to me | contribs) 00:58, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
About some old edits
[edit]This message is about some pretty old edits of yours (December 2020), but I figured I'd drop you a line anyway: {{moth-stub}} is fully redundant to its sub(-sub-sub-etc-)categories like {{Boarmiini-stub}} (it's a more specific type of moth stub) and thus shouldn't be used in combination with it. (Especially since most of those sub-however-many-level categories were created specifically to break up the massive amount of moth-stubs into categories of an easier-to-handle size) No big deal, just figured I'd explain why I'm undoing a bunch of your old edits. AddWittyNameHere 22:00, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
@AddWittyNameHere: Oh, I don't really mind. Thanks for reminding me anyway. treekangaroos (talk to me | contribs) 22:02, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Okay, glad to hear so!
Have a great day! AddWittyNameHere 22:04, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
@AddWittyNameHere: You too! Happy editing! 
treekangaroos (talk to me | contribs) 22:06, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Confusion over removal of edit
[edit]my edit on the Peter Grant (book series) page was removed which I do completely understand since I did it in a silly way i should've noticed, however after correcting this and not including any pertinent copyrighted material and trying my best to minimise it coming off as an add you removed it, and no explanation for the edit was provided, what was your reasoning for this, thanks (sorry if this comes of as passive aggressive) Simonéwallabee42 (talk) 20:53, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
@Simonéwallabee42: I advise you to read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. Then you'll understand why I reverted your edit. treekangaroos (talk to me | contribs) 23:27, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Sorry I sadly don’t understand, it feels just as in line as the rest of the other plot summaries, and I intentionally tried to make it as to not be soapboxy, thanks for the link Simonéwallabee42 (talk) 06:44, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
@Simonéwallabee42: 
You're welcome! Sorry to hear you don't understand. If you ever need any help, try asking for some at the Teahouse. Maybe you'll find better advice there. treekangaroos (talk to me | contribs) 13:37, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice, I have just realised you may have seen my previous edit which also got removed because I was silly and forgot I couldn’t just copy blurbs, which was quickly removed, so did you see the old version since it hadn’t properly changed yet and tried to remove that because it was badly done and so incidentally removed the newer more objective plot summary, because that would make more sense lol Thanks Simonéwallabee42 (talk) 15:48, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
@Simonéwallabee42: No problem. Happy editing! treekangaroos (talk to me | contribs) 18:26, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
your signature
[edit]images are not allowed in signatures per policy. ltbdl (talk) 05:51, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Ltbdl: Oh, man, my bad. I'll be removing the crescent now and replacing it with just the Unicode symbol. The last time I checked, it just said it wasn't recommended, not flat-out forbidden. Thanks for reminding me anyway though. ☽ treekangaroos (throw me a line) 11:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Warning: Edit-warring and restoring unsourced content
[edit]Hi, Cedelmwood. I've blocked the user who you reported to AIV for their personal attacks against you at Special:PageHistory/+57 (song). However, your conduct at that page has also not been okay. You reverted an edit that said "No source", which is a valid reason to remove content from an article. You then reverted again after they insulted you; as rude as what they said was, that isn't on its own a reason to again restore unsourced content to an article. You then did that a second time. Overall, this constitutes edit-warring, and if you continue to make reverts on this article you may be blocked from editing. Furthermore, if you cannot provide a source for the challenged content—most of which was only added recently, on the 5th, by a different IP—you should self-revert your restoration of it. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 04:14, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Tamzin: Got it. Thanks for letting me know; I'll try to learn from my mistakes next time. I digress: it was a tad silly of me to restore the unsourced edit, and I have reverted mine—per your request. ☽ elm talk to me 04:21, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
I'll stop I just thought it was so funny 😭
Thank you for your understanding. elm (she/they) arf, arf, aaaaarf 17:50, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Chris-at-RCS. Tarlby (t) (c) 19:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion
[edit] There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Chris-at-RCS. Tarlby (t) (c) 19:44, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
@Tarlby: Haha, it's alright. elm (she/they) arf! 22:49, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Note
[edit]Cedelmwood, sorry to see what you had to face recently in trying to protect IOS 16 and related articles. In case you didn't know already, in such circumstances, in addition to WP:AIV you can ask for help at WP:RFPP, WP:ANI or at any active admin's talkpage so that you are not left "battling" a vandal on your own. Also, it is best not to engage with such trolls with combative or despairing edit summaries or comments since, paradoxically, that usually just encourages them. Better to simply revert, block and ignore. Cheers and thanks for all your anti-vandalism efforts! Abecedare (talk) 21:40, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
@Abecedare: Got it! I'll be sure not to leave disparaging edit summaries from now on; I take full responsibility of my actions, and I recognize that it was emotionally immature of me to do so. In return of your wisdom, have a cookie. And, thank you for... thanking me for my efforts! Ok, uh... clumsy writing, I know, but... uh, back on track: I really appreciate your kindness. elm (she/they) arf! 21:49, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- Just to be clear: I meant despairing, not disparaging. That is, my concern was that the vandal was "getting to" you, not that you were saying something bad or undeserving about them. So no apologies needed. Just left the note so that you are aware of the resources and techniques available to handle such situations in the future. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 22:04, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
@Abecedare: Oh, okay! I understand now. Thank you for all the help, and cheers to you too! Ah. You know what? Since you've been so kind... I reward thee a barnstar:
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
| Here ye go! I hope I'm not being so overly gushy or socially... awkward that it borders downright creepiness but... really, you seem like a really understanding person, and I wanted to make someone's day. |
elm (she/they) arf! 22:06, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
IP
[edit]Gosh, thanks for the info. Unfortunately I'm not an admin. Would you be able to report the threatening behaviour you encountered at ANI? It's clearly unacceptable. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:49, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
@Chiswick Chap: Sure thing. I'll get to you once they've been blocked. elm (she/they) arf! 15:53, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
appreciation kitten ! !!!
[edit]
i like your userpage and the art in it, kittens help with depression methinks. peep the non-horrors
Hellokittypretty (talk) 19:22, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
@Hellokittypretty: G'aw, thank you so much! You have no idea how much this means to me <3 And, yes. Kittens, indeed, do lessen the depression. elm (she/they) arf! 19:47, 16 April 2025 (UTC)