Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelvyn Alp
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. StarM 23:37, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Kelvyn Alp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable, page is mostly contradictory nonsense Nzv8fan (talk) 08:49, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 05:33, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 05:33, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete. wikipedia is not an open door. plan 8 (talk) 06:00, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- keep Referenced sources indicate he's notable and controversial. Definitely needs a rewrite. But there is substantial interest in the subject and related issues. ChildofMidnight (talk) 09:26, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep Sources suggest he's a mildly notable but highly amusing pseudo-political crank. Ryan Paddy (talk) 09:33, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The sources show enough notability, and the solution to "contradictory nonsense" is to edit the article, not to delete it. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:36, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.