Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summary deletion
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Closing per obvious consensus. — Aitias // discussion 02:23, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Summary deletion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unreferenced dictionary definition full of original research. Reason given for contesting prod was: "It's Christmas Day". Songs of ts steiner (talk) 22:14, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as WP:OR. Could not find any useful source. Salih (talk) 12:45, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator. I found that the page author added this to his user page on 13 November, only three days before he created the article: "If you enjoy summarily deleting or wholesale editing my input, it will only take you a moment longer but why not let me know your motivation? It may have taken me a lot longer to write it.".[1] I wonder if he has had another page deleted and was just expressing his disappointment? Maybe userfy as a courtesy if this is meant to be a personal essay? Llamasharmafarmerdrama (talk) 14:47, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Userfy Sounds a lot like the author had an article deleted and is writing this in frustration. The tying of "summary deletion" to censorship by dictatorships is clever, but does not make the article any more valuable to the encyclopedia. This page is a candidate for summary deletion. I also suggest invoking the snowball clause as this article stands no chance of surviving this AFD. Theseeker4 (talk) 14:54, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not an article at all. Just a rant whose author will probably cool down soon and hopefully make constructive contributions to WP. Northwestgnome (talk) 16:05, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — clearly an axe being ground. – Kieran T (talk) 19:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per kierant. This is an attempt to disrupt Wikipedia to make a point (see Special:Contributions/Redashhope, even though I cannot view deleted contribs; the user is clearly miffed that a recent article he created was deleted). Please take your axe to the hardware store for grinding — not here. MuZemike (talk) 19:37, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.